Archive

Archive for the ‘PTSD’ Category

Does VA’s new proposed PTSD rule mean that I don’t need corroboration for my PTSD stressor?

July 14th, 2010

UPDATE

The proposed new PTSD regulations are now in effect. The text of the regulations can be found at http://frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=K23HwW/0/2/0&WAISaction=retrieve

VA’s fact sheet about the changes can be found at http://www.va.gov/PTSD_QA.pdf

Keep in mind that this does not entirely remove the requirement that PTSD stressors be corroborated – only in specified circumstances, involving situations of hostile military or terrorist activity. The asserted stressor must be consistent with the conditions of the veteran’s service. The new rules also require that a VA examiner give the opinion that the assereted stressor would be sufficient to cause PTSD.

PROPOSED REGULATIONS AUGUST 2009
VA has proposed a change to the PTSD regulations that will eliminate the requirement that a stressor be corroborated if it arises out of “fear of hostile military or terrorist activity.” There will also be a requirement that a VA psychiatrist or psychologist give an opinion that the stressor is adequate to support a diagnosis of PTSD and that the veteran’s symptoms are related to that claimed stressor.

If these conditions are met, the veteran will not have to provide additional evidence to show that the stressor occurred, as long as the stressor is consistent with the places, types and circumstances of the veteran’s service, and as long as there is not clear and convincing evidence that the stressor did not take place.

The PTSD regulations already provided that no additional evidence was necessary if it was a combat-related stressor and the veteran served in combat.

What does this mean in practical effect? If you served in an area where there was “hostile military or terrorist activity” taking place, you no longer have to prove that you were “in combat.” Many times, the combat requirement was used to require additional evidence if the veteran served in a combat area, such as Vietnam or Iraq, but did not have a “combat” MOS. If your official MOS was, let’s say, “aircraft mechanic,” it could be very difficult to convince VA that your stressors were combat related and that you served in combat.

Under the proposed new regulation, VA is now recognizing that other stressors, such as “constant vigilance against unexpected attack, the absence of a defined front line, the difficulty of distinguishing enemy combatants from civilians, [and] the ubiquity of improvised explosive device” are characteristic of “deployment to a war zone,” regardless of whether you were directly serving in a combat role.

It’s important to understand what this doesn’t change – additional evidence will still be required to show that a stressor occurred, if it didn’t take place in a war zone and was not related to “fear of hostile military or terrorist activity.”

The proposed rule, along with VA’s explanation of the rule, can be found at

http://frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=207646362677+5+2+0&WAISaction=retrieve

Sandra W Wischow PTSD, Veterans Benefits Claims ,

Agreement reached in class action lawsuit for veterans diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder who served in Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom

February 2nd, 2010

In December 2008, a class action lawsuit was filed in Sabo v. United States on behalf of veterans who (1) served in Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom, (2) were diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, and (3) were discharged from service with ratings of less than 50 percent.
Recently the attorneys representing the veterans and the government reached an agreement, wherein at least 4,300 members of the class action will be entitled to an expeditious review of their disability evaluations as well as a correction of their past and future benefits.

The disability ratings are essential to veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. A permanent disability rating of 30 percent or higher entitles a veteran to monthly disability benefits for the remainder of the veteran’s life, to free health care for the veteran and his or her spouse for life, and to free health care for their minor children.

Veterans who are eligible for such review are those who were discharged from service between December 17, 2002, and October 14, 2008 and were determined unfit to serve in part due to a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.

While notices have been mailed to roughly 4,300 veterans, if you did not receive a notice and believe you are a veteran who fits the criteria discussion above, you have until July 24, 2010 to “opt-in” to the class action lawsuit. You should go to www.ptsdlawsuit.com to obtain additional information regarding the lawsuit and information on how to become a member of the lawsuit.

David J Lowenstein PTSD, Veterans Benefits Claims ,